Search results for "Scientific Misconduct"

showing 7 items of 7 documents

Integrity measures take its toll: Introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only.

2021

PublishingHistoryBiomedical ResearchbiologyPeer ReviewScientific MisconductCell BiologyBiochemistryRetraction of Publication as TopicRisk analysis (engineering)Tollbiology.proteinHumansMolecular BiologyEditorial PoliciesJournal of cellular biochemistryREFERENCES
researchProduct

An expression of concern on research during the Covid-19 pandemic

2020

2019-20 coronavirus outbreakBiomedical ResearchCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Pneumonia ViralScientific MisconductSettore MED/11BetacoronavirusRetraction of Publication as TopicPandemicHumansMedicinePandemicsClinical Trials as TopicbiologySARS-CoV-2business.industryCOVID-19Reproducibility of ResultsGeneral Medicinebiology.organism_classificationVirologyCoronavirus InfectionsCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessBetacoronavirusCoronavirus Infections
researchProduct

Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception

2019

Abstract Increasing levels of collaboration constitute one of the characteristics of science. However, the knowledge production system is based on a fundamental discordance: on the one hand, it is cooperative in nature, with links articulated through coauthorships, and on the other, the systems for assigning merit and distributing rewards function on an individual scale. This contradiction can give rise to dysfunction and inappropriate practices. This study analyses researchers’ perceptions about the problems associated with authorship in scientific publications. We make use of a coauthorship dissatisfaction index that measures the degree of dissatisfaction with the author order on the byli…

Hierarchymedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesSample (statistics)Library and Information Sciences050905 science studiesComputer Science ApplicationsPerceptionScale (social sciences)Abuse of authorityContradiction0509 other social sciences050904 information & library sciencesPsychologyFunction (engineering)Scientific misconductSocial psychologymedia_commonJournal of Informetrics
researchProduct

Science integrity has been never more important: It's all about trust.

2021

Publishing2019-20 coronavirus outbreakBiomedical ResearchCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)business.industrySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Internet privacyScientific MisconductCell BiologyTrustBiochemistryEthics ResearchPolitical scienceHumansPeriodicals as TopicbusinessMolecular BiologyJournal of cellular biochemistryREFERENCES
researchProduct

Look for methods, not conclusions

2019

Qualunque sia l'esito effettivo di un'indagine su un caso di presunta manipolazione dei dati, ci sono alcuni principi fermi che sono sempre veri e alcuni errori che devono essere evitati.

Cancer ResearchMolecular biologyPeer ReviewScienceImmunologyScientific MisconductSettore AGR/13 - Chimica Agrariamethods; verification experimental datasetresearch integrityDiseasesmethodsCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceCorrespondenceScientific methodHumansexperimental datasetlcsh:QH573-671Scientific misconductPeer Review Researchlcsh:CytologyResearchCell BiologyEngineering ethicsverificationPsychologyHumans; Peer Review Research; Science; Scientific Misconduct
researchProduct

Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology.

2018

Predatory publishing is an exploitative fraudulent open-access publishing model that applies charges under the pretense of legitimate publishing operations without actually providing the editorial services associated with legitimate journals. The aim of this study was to analyze this phenomenon in the field of anesthesiology and related specialties (intensive care, critical and respiratory medicine, pain medicine, and emergency care). Two authors independently surveyed a freely accessible, constantly updated version of the original Beall lists of potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers and standalone journals. We identified 212 journals from 83 publishers, and the total number…

Biomedical ResearchMEDLINELibrary scienceArticle processing chargeDirectoryBibliometrics03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine030202 anesthesiologyAnesthesiologyIntensive careMedicineHumansAnesthesiaScientific misconductEthics in publishingPeer Review ResearchResearch ethicsbusiness.industryFraudAnesthesiology and Pain MedicinePublishingBibliometricsOpen Access PublishingPeriodicals as Topicbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryEditorial PoliciesAnesthesia and analgesia
researchProduct

Support for a colleague.

2004

As collaborators of Anders Pape Moller, we were shocked and surprised to read that he was accused of data fabrication (“Ecologists roiled by misconduct case,” G. Vogel, F. Proffitt, R. Stone, News of the Week, 30 Jan., p. [606][1]). We have never had cause to be concerned about any aspect of

PublishingMisconductMultidisciplinaryEcologyPhilosophyLawScientific MisconductScience (New York, N.Y.)
researchProduct